Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

faraday hats  are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.

Click for info  (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away.  faraday hats  is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).


The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.