Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because  faraday hats  transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters.  https://etextpad.com/ff9u85lua1  is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.


Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

faraday hat  is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.